几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 05:00 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 deflection of steel truss and failure deflection distance

deflection of steel truss and failure deflection distance
was recently called to look at a building with 43 foot steel trusses.they measure two feet high with 3/4 cold roll as truss material.top is two 1 inch angle with the 3/4 welded in between the bottom cord is made of two pieces of 3/4 welded cold roll on each side of truss steel,ends have attachment plate and are mounted solidly,bracing is eight foot out on truss.trusses are on 11 foot centers. after recent snows,with over thirty inches on the metal roof there was 3/4 inch deflection.this was measured after roof was shoveled off.any one have any idea what the total deflection for safety or roof collapse would be?
find a job or post a job opening
a common total deflection limit of l/240 for that span would equate to a little over 2" at mid-span. while large deflections doesn't necessarily mean
thank you for the info,this is not a totally flat roof so ponding would not occcur. i guess this roof was in no danger of collapse at this time.always a reassuring thought.
srr, don't be reassured too easily. it sounds to me (based upon the minimal data provided) that the roof trusses may have been underdesigned from the beginning. the top chord seems too small to be much more than a chord size of 1 or 2, which for a 24" deep joist does not even seem to conform to sji requirements. and the 11' spacing seems excessive for the size and span. without accurate data, it seems that the roof trusses may only be capable of supporting a total load of less than 20 psf, which doesn't seem correct at all.
i suggest you obtain accurate measurements of the various components and attempt to ascertain which joist configuration actually exists at the facility, using the method described in the steel joist institute's 60 year manual.
thank you;
as for toal load i guess it has already been tested by fire for more than twenty pounds.according to cornell's snow load data.medium density snow of which this was weighs twelve pounds per square foot and with almost thirty six inches on the roof it figures to 36.i do agree that i will have to look a little more closely at it.it is not an engineered building,so anything is possible.it is a rather lightweight roof so that helps and does have fall at a 2/12 pitch.also with bracing eight feet in from both sides the actual clearspan is 27 feet which should help considerably.
more data always helps.
when you originally wrote bracing at 8', i thought you meant lateral bracing. if the bracing is providing vertical support, it changes the situation entirely. the configuration of the bracing is critical though. if it is only a compression member buttressing the underside of the joist/truss, with no lateral bracing at the same point, then lateral buckling of this additional support is a major consideration, and he analysis becomes considerably more complex. i suggest you model and run a three-dimensional frame analysis, if that is the case.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
allowable beam deflection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:50 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:16 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多