几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 11:57 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 fire resistance of hilti chemical adhesive

fire resistance of hilti chemical adhesive
hi guys,
how does hilti chemical adhesive perform when exposed to fire for a prolonged period of time. i am looking at a steel i-beam framing into a tilt-up concrete wall panel, typical we provide cast-in anchors because of the common perception that the adhesive of a chemical anchor will 'melt away' during a fire and consequently the tilt-up will fall outwards creating a potentially dangerous situation.
because of this perception we have always provided cast-in or mechanical anchors for this connection so this situation is avoided.
i was reading a hilti brochure toady that was saying that chemical adhesive has good fire-performance. is this true and does anyone else provide the detail that i have explained above of should i be keeping with the mechanical anchoring.

hilti are
asixth,
nothing against hilti, but for these type connections, i would stick with cast in ferrules, with expansion anchors for secondary connections if required. when the steel fails in a fire, it needs to be able to pull the wall inward with it rather than allowing the wall to fall outward. so i don't want to depend on adhesive anchors.
asixth,
i agree with hokie, the hilti product do come with a fire rating level, these rating are using the concrete as a heat sink, but they will fail after you get past your nominated level, then teh panel falls outward. if your in aust you will have to design them for 3 times the load of a cast-in feral to complie with the bca.
henry & hymes have a good article on tilt panels in a fire, here they give reduction factors for different items in temperature situations, for a cast-in anchor you get 0.7 reduction compared to of 0.05 to 0.01 for chemical anchor (published by hitli). i know which one i would want to bet my house on.

when in doubt, just take the next small step.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
fire resistance for hollowcore slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 11:57 AM
fire effects for clay tile or concrete masonry huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 11:51 AM
concrete floor fire resistance rating huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:07 PM
adhesive anchors in concrete - whats the current situation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:16 AM
adhesive anchor bolts installed underwater huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:16 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:56 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多