几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 12:03 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 fire walls

fire walls
i have a design that consists of 3-story storage with steel frame and concrete composite deck. the size of the building requires a fire wall that separates the structure in two. i have designed the floor framing so that the adjecent steel line resides 10 feet from the masonry wall, resulting in the floor deck to span between the steel support and a shelf angle bolted to the masonry wall. this allows me to use the wall for bearing as well as a shear wall.
the code for fire walls requires that a collapse on one side shall not cause a collapse on the other side (and the wall to remain). my feeling is that the bolts and/or angle on the fire side would fail and that the bolts on the "good" side would prevent wall damage.
it seems terribly excessive to build a steel line immediately on either side of the masonry wall.
thanks for any input.
zulak
normally, to meet the code explicitly on this matter, you do have to essentially build two separate structures with a wall between that is fire rated. you then have to consider that the fire can occur on either side and if so, with a building collapse, ensure that the wall/floor connection will fail before the wall itself will fail.
this can be somewhat difficult as you do not know the exact mechanism by which the structure fails.
alternatively, you build two walls separated completely so that collapse on one side doesn't affect the other.
we designed a single story warehouse in pennsylvania a few years ago that used a single cmu wall and separate steel framing on each side (the wall was therefore non-load bearing). the connections of the wall to the steel was just adequate to support the required lateral loads on the walls (in this case a 5 psf lateral code pressure perpendicular to the wall). lateral bracing for the building was added, and the wall did not serve as a shearwall.
i agree with you zulak that it seems excessive to build two structures next to each other. from a purely engineering point of view and not a code point of view i would say that the fire wall should be stable in the event of a fire on one side. this is the case as long as the failure of the first line of steel does not redistribute so much floor load to the wall that the wall fails. you have to assume that the first line of steel could be affected by the fire and fail before the bolts are affected. in which case you may need to check the wall for additional redistributed floor load and ensure failure of the bolts before failure of the wall.
carl bauer
a reference is nfpa 221: standard for fire walls and fire barrier walls. structural stability and strength is discussed for the various types of fire walls (cantilevered, tied, double). i think it costs about $20.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
fire walls 9again0 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:03 PM
fire rated walls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 11:54 AM
do existing unreinf cmu walls need to follow tms 530 seismic huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:04 PM
buttress wall relative rigidity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:57 PM
below grade masonry walls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:51 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多