几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 04:47 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 hollow core under uplift 9wind loads0

hollow core under uplift (wind loads)
good morning,
i'm looking at a concrete pump station in south florida. the wind pressures are reaching 83 psf (gross uplift) on the roof. i plan on using a precast concrete hollow core deck that will span 28 feet.
anyone have a feel for when it's a good idea to just use a heavy deck, rather than top slab resteel? an 8" hollow core slab will span 28 feet, but only weights 62 psf. we are the design engineers for the building, not the actual deck. i just want to make sure we show something practical.
hollow core slabs are usually not symmetric in the vertical location of the prestress cables, the vertical load capability is different in the downward vs upwards loading.
in using a topping, the additional concrete increases the strength for gravity loads (but only increases the weight for resisting uplift). the difference between the weight and the uplift is all the slab must resist in the uplift wind loading, (assuming the uplift is greater than the constructed weight), and the inverted strength of the hollowcore is usually able to resist this small force. if the 62 psf weight is subtracted form the 83 psf uplift, then the net uplift is 21 psf. a 2" topping makes this net uplift go to nothing which eliminates the analysis of connections at the edges and load path to the footing.
can you use an angle to secure the hc with bolts between the planks?
dik
are you allowed to just take 83-62 = 21?
don't you have to use 0.6d + w?
why dont you put l bars from the wall into the cores. most manufacturers will allow for the top of 1 or 2 cores to be removed at the ends for grout placement.
the following website is australian, but it gives great fixing details.
if you need any of these details to make it work then tell the hollowcore manufacturer that is required. it is the responsibility of the primary engineer to ensure that the interfaces are taken care of.
you should also specify to the hollowcore designer that their slabs be designed to resist the required uplift loads.
as they are symetric, there is no reason why this cant be done.
if you go along the route of adding extra concrete to the top, re
quote:
the difference between the weight and the uplift is all the slab must resist in the uplift wind loading
i would agree with jike - you must use 0.6d + w as the controlling combo for this uplift.
i would also add that 83 psf for component wind seems pretty high. for 120 mph wind, exp c, i get c&c roof uplift in the mid to upper 30's. just checking....
jae - south florida, if you're in the high velocity hurricane zone, is 146 mph exp c. south florida has it's own section of each fbc chapter, termed "high velocity hurricane zone". with that velocity and exposure you can get over 130 psf for your c&c negative roof pressures in some cases. even 130mph can get you over 100 psf.
i agree also about using 0.6d+w, not just d+w.
thanks for all the great information. our south florida client factors up the 3 second wind gust. we are designing for roughly 158 mph due to client provisions.
my big concern is about the amount of reinforcement that is required in the top of the deck to resist the suction. we can either use more steel in the deck, or a heavy deck. i'm just not sure what is cheaper.
the topping mentioned brings up a good point. at 83 psf uplift, can the cold joint between the deck and the topping hold?
as i understand the code, the 0.6d is 60% of the likely minimum dead load at the time of the wind event. typically i add in some dl for mechanical and electrical. this is conservative for gravity design, but would not be conservative for wind uplift design. i typically have two dead load numbers based on upward or downward loads.
l shaped bars in the topping and at the grout keys between the hollow core slabs and into the supporting walls allow you to include wall dead weight and doweled footing in the d total. the cold joint between the top of slab and topping is keyed into the edge grooves and if nominally clean is in the order of vacuum strength for 3000 psi f'c (14.7 psi).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
hollow core plank to shear wall connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:45 PM
hollow core plank details huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:45 PM
hollow core connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:44 PM
hollow core chord reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:44 PM
cmu block walls with hollow core slab - how high huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:29 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:56 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多