几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 05:14 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 how can determine subgrade modulus

how can determine subgrade modulus
if i have beareaing capacity ( 10 tn/m2 ) , how i can determine the value of ( subgrade modulus ) for this soil
do a plate load test.
. . . and then the fun begins . . .
bigh...i forgot to mention you then have to figure out what it means!
bigh,
please rescue me if i slip.
the allowable soil bearing pressure is given for a max. settlment of 25mm (1"), so, conservativle, we can assume that the modulus of subgrade reaction is 40x abp (in metric units) or equal to abp (in us units). sounds basic so far right?
my question is: is factor of safelty used for the allowable bearing pressure incororated before the 1" settlement or after. in other words, what caused the 1" settlement: the abp or abpx sf?
since i'm exclusively a structual guy, my tendency is to always ask a geotech guy about subgrade modulus.... by the way, it is often difficult to get them to commit to a value (probably because is soil is never really elastic). that's why my old company always made sure that providing this was part of the contract.
josh
i would think the elastic modulus would be a good bit stiffer than indicated by the maximum settlement figures.
ailmar - the allowable bearing pressurefff"> is, in my view a serviceability issue (viz., settlement). there is no "factor of safety" on it other than conservatism in estimating the settlements under the bearing pressures. allowable bearing capacityfff"> is based on shear and, of course there is a safety factor involved or load reduction factors (coming at it from the other end).
the net allowable bearing pressure to get 25 mm settlement is really size dependent as well. as the footing gets larger, with the same bearing pressure (and assuming consistent soil behaviour below), the settlements will obviously increase. this is why you will many times see a curve of allowable bearing pressure (for service limit) vs width of footing.
you can determine the "operative" subgrade modulus at your bearing pressure from knowing the settlement vs pressure curve for each size of footing.
hope this makes sense? i've got sliding and seepage on the mind today . . .
carlb: - but you blew it by apologising!!
thank you (ailmar) & please tel me what you men ( abp ) ?
allowable bearing pressure (abp)
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
corelation of subgrade modulus and bearing capacity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:01 PM
confused with aisc code about section modulus huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:07 PM
built up section - sction modulus huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:46 PM
assuming subgrade modulus for finite element foundation desi huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:40 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:00 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多