几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 09:40 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 lateral force 2 expansion joint frame

lateral force @ expansion joint frame
i have one rectangulat steel building frame( single storey) with one full width expansion joint that divides the building into lengths "l1" & "l2".
my 3 nos. braced/moment frames are located at each end(frame 1,3) of building and at expansion joint(frame 2).
my concern is :
how the lateral wind/seismic(parallel to expansion joint) will be distributed at the expansion joint frame(frame 2)?
will it take lateral force contribution from length "l1" only and nothing from length "l2"?
in other words will the frame-3 at end will have to take all the lateral force contributed by "l2" and frame 1 & 2 will take lateral force from "l1" only?
there is only single column at expansion grid with sliding beam connection.
thanks
it isn't a true expansion joint as you have explained it.
a three frame long building with an expansion joint right next to the middle frame. that doesn't work. you'll have to add an additional frame next to your middle frame such that you'll have two buildings, with a frame at each end. to be a true expansion joint, the buildings have to be completely separate. basically, if one building was completely taken apart and removed, the other building would still stand and be structurally sound.
i'm just guessing, but usually if a building only needs three frames, maybe it doesn't need an expansion joint at all. 200-300 feet is a decent standard, depending on the materials, and your experience.
aggieyank,
the building is 700' long, so an exp. joint( approx. 8" wide) is reqd. so, i should take 2 frames on each side of exp. joint and then treat it as 2 separate buildings on each side of exp. joint. is this what you are trying to say?
thanks,
that is correct lokstr. the architect should show some sort of flashing or expansion joint cover, but structurally, treat them as separate buildings.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
flange brace force huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:15 PM
expansion joints in concrete tanks huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 09:09 AM
difference between a construction joint and an expansion joi huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:40 PM
concrete slab on grade expansion joint questions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:43 PM
building expansion joint or no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:37 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:14 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多