几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 10:04 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 leave rebar exposed for future construction

leave rebar exposed for future construction?
i have to plan for a future clarifier to be built adjacent to the pump station and clarifier i am currently designing. that is, eventually, it will be two clarifiers with a pump station between, but only the one clarifier will be built in this contract. what's the best way to detail the foundation so that it can be expanded later? could i leave rebar exposed--coated and protected--ready to receive the future basin mat? is there a "soft" concrete that could be demo'd later? or should i just let the next guy worry about it?
check out our whitepaper library.
i have done this very thing - leave the rebar exposed but protected from the elements. do you need a water stop between the two adjacent structures? need to think about that too....greenstreak has some good guidance.
threaded bar couplers such as lenton formsavers might be a good solution.
you could use screww in rebar splices fixed to the formwork so that nothing projects past the face of the slab. the new rebar would just need to be supplied threaded to fit.
this would be much easier than chipping away lean mix concrete.
they do a similar thing with ferrules in precast panels.
on electric generating stations we would leave exposed rebar that was coated and wrapped with asphaltic compounds. technically, this worked well... the problem was no matter how carefully the plans were detailed to show what had been done the next engineer of record would not accept the existing rebar as satisfactory for use.
the best compromise solution that we (the owner) found was to leave clearly defined area where the existing concrete could be drilled (in the future) and appropriate size rebar dowels grouted, epoxied, etc. into place.
we're dealing with a similar situation. our client wishes to build 3 sbr tanks, 2 now and one at a later date. we considered dowel bar splicers. problem is, it may be years before the 3rd unit is built, and we were afraid the slicers would corrode. we've decided to build the double unit and have the third tank constructed separately, a few feet away with no attachment.
i have successfully used the threaded couplers. i have also used concrete poured around rebar. joints were detailed so that the removal of the concrete was somewhat easier. of the two methods, i would use the threaded couplers again if it met the project requirements.
i've used galvanized bent rebar, both exposed and enclosed in a plywood 'box'. i've also used a weak mix concrete that is removed at the time the addition has been added. it's a matter of approaching the existing as though the addition is proceeded with. i've often encountered buildings that an addition was intended and have found some parts have been missed. i've also done many buildings with a future addition that the addition was never built.
dik
if the joint is going to be submerged after the future construction, you'll need to embed waterstop and protect it. all of the engineers that routinely do this work have a typical detail for this situation. you might want to look at other projects and check what they're doing.
as far as your original question, i agree with sperlingpe. the threaded couplers are the way to go.
the real problem with this detail is to make sure the contractor puts it in at all. it's hard to get them to put in quality work to help out the guy on the next project.
it would be good to hear from engineers who have been on the other end of this scenario. has anyone attached a concrete tank to an existing tank that was fitted with mechanical couplers? how old was the existing tank? how did it go?
we're on both ends. we're currently expanding a plant where one phase is about 3 years old and the other is 12 years old. the couplers are in pretty good shape. their placement isn't as precise as maybe we would hope for but it's usually good enough.
the waterstop is the tougher issue. it needs to be protected, but not so protected that we damage it getting off the protection. i've seen several ways to do this all of which work preetty good. using class c (2500 psi) concrete, galvanized sheet metal, redwood all are ok, but it's never as good as new.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
greased rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:07 PM
flame cutting rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:15 PM
epoxy coated rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:38 PM
difference between a construction joint and an expansion joi huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:40 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:29 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多