几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 02:18 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 minimum seismic base shear- asce 7-2002

minimum seismic base shear- asce 7-2002
section 9.14.4.1 requires minimum seismic lateral force per section 9.5.5.2. section 9.5.5.2.1 says "when the fundamental period of the structure is computed, the seismic design coefficient cs shall be determined in accordance with the following equation" and gives eq. 9.5.5.2.1-1 for cs. so the question: if the fundamental period is not computed, is that equation no longer applicable?
it seems odd because the period doesn't actually enter into the equation in question- simply the fact that it's been calculated gives me a higher seismic load. if i don't calculate a fundamental period i fall back to 9.14.5.1-1, which gives me a much lower shear. does this sound reasonable?
also, in section 9.14.5.1, note 7 says that for certain structures, "the minimum seismic design force shall not be less than that required by the approved standard for that system". does this mean that structures covered under note 7 do not need to meet the requirements of 9.5.5.2?
thanks for any input!
hmmm, my 9.14.4.1 refers to section 9.6. the t enters the capping equation for cs, 9.5.5.2.1-2.
did you mean that you're in 7-05? your title has 02.
the reference is equation 9.14.5.1-1, which is in section 9.14.5.1.
after looking at this some more, i think the intent of it all is that for structures that fit under that note 7 in 9.14.5.1, none of the 9.5.5.2 stuff is applicable- note 7 is one of the "following additions and exceptions" in 9.14.5.1.
no, it is in -02.
i think that you have section 9.5.5.2.1 outlining the basic seismic factor cs which is based upon four equations (1-4).
section 9.14.5.1 says that you must use 9.5.5.2
except
substitute the two given equations (9.14.5.1-1 and -2) for the 9.5.5.2 equations 3 and 4. these are just the minimum values.
exception 7 seems to refer to table 9.14.3 (via 9.14.7.3.1)where specific standards have been develop for particular types of non-building structures. if you appear to fall into those categories, then non of asce 7 seismic directly applies - you should go to those specific standards.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
can i count on shear-friction capacity of the reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:22 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM
beam shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:01 PM
base shear distribution huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:29 PM
base shear calculation fron ibc and asce-7 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:29 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:31 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多