几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:56 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 osha ladders

osha ladders
i have a question regrading the allowable height of a fix ladder per osha guidelines. i have a copy of osha 3124-12r 2003 which indicates that a caged ladder, with multiple sections, may extend a maximum of 50ft for each section with each section offset from the next setion. however, per section osha 29cfr1910.27 the maximum height is given at 30ft. i am curious as to why two publications from the same source have different guidelines (i did chck osha website to see if the date on the guideline is current and it appears to be). are there different circumstance when one is applicable and the other is not?
thanks for any insight. this is more of a general question as i would follow the more stringent criteria, but just curious.

we have always recommended ladder breaks and rest decks at a maximum of 30' -- actually - we usually install them at about 26' due to the fact we are in the scaffolding business and that is a common "break" due to leg lengths.
permanent and temporary regs are different. i suppose that temporary scaffolding is used everyday by a lot of people for a short period of time. whereas permanent might be used just a few times a year for maintenance work. just a thought.
you might check out osha 1926.450 on scaffolding and 1926.1053 for ladders
osha rules are based on ansi standards. the ansi standards were revised to 50' some time back, along with a bunch of other changes. osha then came up with proposed revisions to their rules, and published them. but, for some reason, these rules never were finalized, and the old rules are still the one in the cfr. however, per various osha interpretations, a ladder meeting the proposed standard will be considered a "de minimis" violation that will not be cited or fined. the proposed standard has recently been revived.
on the osha website, look for interpretations with "ladder" in them, and some of them should show the details.
thanks for the insight.
mike,
i would agree i would not advise installing/designng greater than 30' myself. this happen to be an existing situation which is greater than 30' but less than 50'. i will of course do whatever the client chooses, but wanted to supply the client with info that could possibly save money.
jcstephen,
thanks for the info and where to locate additional comments. below is the link that best describes what you indicated in case others want to read.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
osha handrail or guardrail huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 10:56 AM
osha and anchor bolt requirements huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 10:54 AM
osha anchor requirements huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 10:54 AM
ibc osha stairs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:35 PM
gymanastic ring design loads osha fall restraint 2,250 lbs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:35 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:26 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多