几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 12:09 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 perimeter steel beam

perimeter steel beam
most of my design has been with concrete but when designing steel buildings, there is one thing that bothers me. when designing and detailing a steel beam at the roof level along the exterior perimeter of the building with joists parallel to the beam, we show an angle kicker from the bottom flange of the beam to the top chord of the joist. many older details use cross bracing for the joists in the end bay. sji wants us to get away from cross bracing because it doesn't allow the joists to deflect. sji likes horizontal bracing in the end bays (each horizontal brace provides a minimum of 750 lbs. of lateral resistence). even if we follow sji and use horizontal bridging in the end bay, we are still putting in the kicker at the steel beam. therefore, the beam is not allowing the joists to deflect contradicting sji's desires. another problem i have with the kicker is this. we put the kicker to brace the bottom flange from lateral forces coming from wind but when the joists are loaded, the bottom of the beam is just kicked out the other way (outwards from the building).
the same is also true with joists perpendicular to the beam, we have an angle kicker from the bottom flange of the beam to the bottom chord of the joist at the first panel point. same result as above.
can anyone share how they treat and detail perimeter steel beams at the roof?
check out our whitepaper library.
we provide kickers as you suggest. however, we also show the vertical reaction of the kicker on the joist so the joist manufacturer can design for it.
if the joist is inhibited in its deflection....doh. isn't that a good thing?
if you limit the joist deflection you are also implying that the joist won't be stressed to the same degree. the kicker would limit the vertical joist deflection only if the joist is loaded and the beam is not - or if both are loaded and the beam is significantly stiffer than the joist.
in this case, you'd have resulting vertical forces on the joist from the different amounts of load taken by the beam and joist. again - just design for it.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
masonry bearing wall, supporting steel beam, joist, pos huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 12:25 PM
lateral support - steel beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 09:52 AM
cantilevered steel i-beam capacity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:45 PM
cantilever steel beam at column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:40 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:25 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多