几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 04:46 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 rebar pattern in a slab with circular openings

rebar pattern in a slab with circular openings
hi guys,
i am trying to design an 8 ft thick table top slab (52 ft x 15 ft rectangular) standing on concrete columns 8 ft x 8 ft. the columns stand on an 8 ft thick mat.
--- the table top slab has 4 circular openings of 26 ft dia each.
--- very heavy circular drums will sit on anchor bolts around the openings. its a very heavy seismic zone.
--- the concrete columns are at 4 corners, as well as on the perimeter between drums, totaling 10 columns.
--- the rebar pattern that i have decided for the slab is: longitudinal rebars between columns in n-s and e-w directions. for the circular openings, i have decided for rebars in circular pattern all around the openings, and in concentric layers in plan.
guys, i want your opinions on the rebar layout, specially the circular pattern, as this is something which i have no precedent of.
thanks in advance.
find a job or post a job opening
check the posted dimensions again- the openings are larger than the table top right now.
i hope the slab thickness is 8" opposed to 8'.
agreed, the dimensions look suspect. you should check them.
if he's putting heavy 26' diameter drums on a slab with corner supports, it won't be 8".
hey guys,
sorry to catch your posts a little late.
the columns are 43 ft apart center to center. so the drum openings are ok. the 8 ft thickness is also ok. the slab dimensions are 170 ft x 50 ft. sorry for giving the dimensions in m instead of ft in my earlier post.
my first thought for the layout of a mat would be to run bars lengthwise and crosswise leaving a big square opening at each of the circular openings (think that's what you were looking at.) then run straight bars at 45 degrees to the others to fill in the corners.
jstephen is right. using circular bars around the openings is needlessly complicated.
the opening is actually a 16 sided polygon. so, running rebars parallel to each side of the polygon will create so many layers of rebars that they will fill most of the slab thickness (as i have 4 layers of rebars top and bottom, for both the straight rebars as well as for rebars at 45 degrees). that is the reason i am inclined towards circular pattern of rebars.
i wouldn't run bars parallel to each side of your polygon. i would follow jstephen's suggestion for a circular hole, with bars lengthwise, crosswise and at 45°. this pattern never has more than six layers at any point. with this reinforcing pattern, one can visualize how a load travels from any point on the slab to the support. with a circular rebar pattern, it's harder to visualize the load path.
i agree with the pattern proposed by jstephen giving an octagonal opening. save the circles for another day.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
post-tensioned beams parallel to slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 01:51 PM
how to thicken an existing concrete slab on grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:54 PM
crack in old floor slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:20 PM
【转帖】hatching entities yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 12:01 PM
【转帖】a hatch problem yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 03:07 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:42 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多