几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:14 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 stone sign base

stone sign base
i have a stone sign (5'wide x 4' tall above grade, 4" thick sandstone) that is being set for a subdivision entrance sign. the city has asked for a stamped and signed foundation for this thing. bearing capacity and frost depth are easy to acheive. what concerns me is our wind loads (138mph) and how to make sure this thing is connected properly to the fndn so it doesn't blow over. i was thinking they could set the sign, form the foundation, and pour the concrete so its integral with the sign base. they had planned on having it protrude 16" deep into the foundation.
i had mentioned the thought of drilling holes near the bottom of the sign (in the fndn) every 16" and running a #5 bar through horizontally in order to help with the lateral loading, of course the contractor doesn't like that idea.
it would seem having 16" of the sign base embedded in concrete would be suffecient. i assumed i would calc wind load from asce 7-05 and make sure there is enough mass in the fndn to resist this overturning moment. i guess the failure would probably occur at the sign base by snapping the stone; this sandstone isn't the toughest stuff, but 4" thick is pretty tough.
is there a better way to approach this? any ideas? am i making a mountain out of a molehill?
thanks guys...
check out our whitepaper library.
will they allow you to attach a couple of steel section vertical strongbacks to the backside of the sign that are embedded in the concrete foundation, then thru-bolt the sign to the strongbacks?
mike mccann
mccann engineering
embedding the sandstone into the footing should work fine, and 16" is probably overkill. the typical way i have seen it done is to cast the footing, leaving a slot for the panel, then set the panel and grout between the panel and concrete. but if they can hold the panel in place, casting it in is good.
i would lean towards hokie66's solution with the block out slot in the footing. it would be much easier to cast the footing first without having to hold the sign in place while the concrete sets.
thanks guys,
i can't put the strong backs in due to asthetics, both sides of the sign are etched. the contractor says he wants to wet set it, so i think that will work great and be stronger. i looked at wind loads and the otm and the footer mass will resist the otm and i think 16" embedded is plenty. i feel pretty good about it..
thanks,
what stops the sign sinking further than 16".
i would call up a support pad/block under each end of the sign to hold it at the required height. then you can run reo underneath betwwen the blocks and you know it is going to stay put.
csd
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
stone panel anchorages huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 10:13 AM
rigidity of steel column base plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:59 PM
rigid base plate design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:55 PM
pinned base in a concrete wall - is it really achievable huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 12:34 PM
base plate design ignores corners of base plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:24 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:16 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多