几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:38 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ack welding rods

tack welding rods
i'm detailing anchor bolts for column base plates. i've got a threaded rod embeded in the concrete footing. for anchorage of the rod, i do not want to bend or hook the rod. 2 questions for everyone...
1 - i've seen an embeded nut, a nut and washer, 2 nuts sandwiching a plate, and 2 nuts with 2 washers sandwiching a plate. any opinions?
2 - to keep the nut in place, i've seen tack welding and burring the threads of the rod. preferences? what rods can and cannot be tack welded? (astm a36, a193 b7, a307, a354, a449, a572, a588, a687, f1554)
i guess it would be nice to know what the difference between all the materials is as well (if you have some extra time on your hands).
1.) we show a tack welded nut for our typical detail. you can provide a plate washer if you need a larger bearing area (this will help with pull-out capacity, and to some extent with tension breakout if you need it to). when using a plate, be sure to design the thickness for bending from the bearing pressure of the concrete when the rod goes into tension.
2.) we show it tack welded. i don't see a reason to burr the threads (if it's welded), but it won't hurt anything if they do. f1554 is the standard material for anchor rods. gr 36 is weldable. gr 55 is only weldable if you spec the s1 supplement. i don't believe gr 105 is weldable.
f1554 is the comm
almost any grade of steel is weldable, but some are easier than others. all of the mild steels a36, a307, f1554(36) are weldable without any difficulty. one of the problems with tack welding high strength steels is that you get a significant metallurgy change at the weld interface, so cracks can initiate easier at those points.
tack welding a nut or nut+plate washer is not a problem
my apologies for the welding comment. i didn't realize you were only asking about the tack welding, i thought you were asking about welding in general (e.g. anchor rod extension).
i went to a seminar recently (yesterday) where the speaker mentioned this detail. he states that tack welding to prevent the nut from backing off of is acceptable as long as you do it to the underside of the nut. any changes to the metallurgy will not have an affect on the system because it is on the underside of the nut where no load demand is required.
i believe the speaker mentioned that when you order f1554 36ksi rods you are more likely going to get 55 ksi rods (because the suppliers think giving a higher grade is better). he said, "if you are going to need the rods to be welded then you need to spec f1554 55ksi with the s1 supplement". not sure if this is true or not.
our standard detail is to use double nuts and washers.... but you run the risk of these not being installed (happened to me once before).

thanks everyone. if you use the double nut, do you still need to tack the bottom nut? i would imagine the clamping force of the nuts would hold them in place. based on steelpe's comment, you can not tack the top nut?

the detail we use, the double nut and washer, does not need a tack weld. when the nuts are put together and tightened they should be impossible to back off.
the point of tacking the nut is not to hold it in place during concrete placement, it is to make sure the rod does not turn during tightening of the anchor nuts.
bring the nut flush with the end surface of the rod. weld it on the end. you can add or plate washer or not, though the washer will add load capacity as structuraleit noted.
since there is no produce for welding a nut to an anchor bolt we don't spec. it. some agencies will not allow it, since most of the time you are welding a high strength nut, there is some concern over its effects. plus using a double nut is so easy, i would bet that it's faster as well.
if there is no tack weld, will a double nut (w/ or w/o a plate/washer) prevent the rod from turning while tightening? if so, does it make sense to always use a double nut, and add a plate/washer only if needed?
the double nut would then be the ideal detail. it would eliminate the need for tack welding the rod (which may or may not be ok), and avoid welding onto the nut and washer (which no one likes).
it also sounds like no one is particulary concerned about tacking to the rod (even if it is "weldable" or not), nuts and washers as long as the tack weld is away from the loaded areas (like the bottom of the nut).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
sag rods bracing wind girts huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 07:54 PM
rebar weldability huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 04:49 PM
no spark welding huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:28 PM
low hydrogen welding rods vs. mild steel eletrodes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:49 AM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:25 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多