几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:05 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 calculating w for earthquake loads

calculating w for earthquake loads
hi all,
in calculating w for the calculations of earthquake loads, do we have to account for the weight of the partition walls supported directly on the foundations? a colleague of mine thinks that half of that weight should be accounted for. also, how do you account for the weight of masonry partitions? do you calculate the area of these walls and multiply it by the weight per unit area or simply use some udl value?
thanks
w is defined in section 12.7.2 of asce 7-05. it says to use either the actual partition weight or 10 psf.
the walls at the bottom story sitting on a slab on grade or thickened strip footings do need to be included if they are attached to the floor or roof diaphragm above, but only half of the height of the wall needs to be considered as half of the lateral force goes directly to the foundation. the rest is lumped into the floor/roof diaphragm above and included in the "w" for the seismic calcs.
even if the walls are sitting on a short crawlspace. i would use the same approach. not so though with a full basement. then, the lower half of the wall would be lumped into the lower floor diaphragm and have to be resisted by the concrete foundation walls.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
'the effective seismic weight w including the total dead load .. (dead load includes ...walls.. built in partitions, etc., etc.) and other loads listed below ' ...
'where an allowance for partition loads is included in the floor load design, the actual partition weight or a minimum of 10psf of floor area, which ever is greater', would be included in w.
greater is what we're empahsizing here, but also i'm refering to asce 7-02. it is not a relevant code here but i use it for reference. has this document changed much from 02 to 05?
in my opinion a masonry partition would be a built in or permanent partition or wall and not likely moved over the life of the structure therefore fit into the dead load catagory and not the live load catagory such as movable partitions or unknown partition distribution/location as is typical of office occupancies.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
calculating rebar diameter for concrete landing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:02 PM
calculating loads on concrete slabs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:01 PM
calculating asce wind loads on a pratt space truss huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:58 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:54 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多