几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:45 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 cantilevered roof girders

cantilevered roof girders
i am looking at 30 year old roof. the framing consists of joists at 6' on center, supported by wide flange girders. the wide flange girders are cantilevered over the columns varying distances and spliced, i guess to save weight. i've looked at it with enercalc and can't get any of the girders to work. the splices appear to be moment splices as well, but i've seen other jobs where they are just shear splices. is there an easy way to analyze a row of cantilevered and spliced girders. it seems complicated to figure out what end is supporting what end (and what end is reacting on what end). especially for 30 years ago when they didn't have computers. they must have had an easy way to do it.
check out our whitepaper library.
aisc manual of steel construction has some charts in it for cantilevered construction with moment coefficients.
thirty years ago was not that long ago, it could have be done on a main-frame computer... but you are probably right.
suggest you try the easy way first - check the beams as if they all have simple supports. this could very easily be how it was done then (with a slide rule or 4-function calculator). you may find, with that assumption, the wf's work.
if i am wrong to propose this, you will find out very quickly, too.
the splices could have been used thinking that they would make things "better"... but in reality, they did not.
that type of engineering problem-solving was common before computers became available - take a complex problem that you do not have the tools to analyze cost-effectively and "transform" it into an "simplified" model that you can address. then add things, like the splices, to tie everything together. a shame that this approach it did not always give the right answer.
if they are shear-connected only, i would take the reactions from the beams in between the column as loads on the end of the cantilever.
------------o---------o------------
^ ^ ^ ^
is that what you have? the circles represent shear connections between columns. now you have a simply-supported middle beam and two continuous beams with an overhang and point load at the end of the overhang.
most single story frames with cantilevered girders used shear splices for the suspended span. occasionally, you might run across one with moment splices.
frames with shear splices can be analyzed statically but those with moment frames should be analyzed as continuous beams.
years ago, some engineers assumed that the splice or point of inflection was a braced point. some engineers positively braced this point while others did not. this may be part of the reason that things are not checking out.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
cantilevered concrete beam - applied deflection versus momen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:42 PM
building a flat porch roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:29 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
a flat roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:05 AM
30 tilt-up and k-series owj roof collapse huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:38 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:40 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多