几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 07:02 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 distribution of shear forces in four story building

distribution of shear forces in four story building
i am a recent graduate that has been given the task to design a four story timber frame building. the building consists of two wings that are at an angle of 140 deg. it has an elevator shaft that extends from the underground parking garage to the fourth floor.it also has a fire separation wall that also extends from the first floor to the fourth floor. the fire wall is approximately 5 feet from the edge of the elevator shaft. the length of each wing is approximately 219 feet. wind load always governs in this part of the country (eastern canada), wind load is 30psf.how do you locate the centre of resistance (cr) for this shape building? should i project the lengths of each wing vertically and consider the building as a rectangular building or should i consider each wing to be an individual building and locate the cr for each wing? if the shaft and fire wall do not provide enough shear resistance i will have to use some of the timber walls. i assume i would have to calculate the stiffness of each element (concrete, masonary wall, and wooden wall), k=ei=etl^3/12 and distribute the load according to the stiffness of each element.any help would certainly be appreciated. p.s. i know, i know, this is way too long.


i don't think you can make a 219 foot wing work in timber without an interior shear wall; hopefully, you will have a few walls that line up top to bottom within that space.
calculor,
i think you need to separate two wings structurally analyse for wind forces separately for better lateral resistace.you may definitely need to help with additional shear walls.
of course the latter procedure is well known, find out the relative stiffness of the walls and distribute the lateral loads. ubc 97 requires to do rigid diaphram analysis which not very practical for wood framed structures, whoose behaviour is more like a flexible diaphram.
so, you may employ the envelope method i.e. analyse by both flexible and rigid diaphram methods and take the worst wall forcesf for your design.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
distribution of horizontal shear stree by bs8110, cl.5.4.7.2 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:01 PM
can i count on shear-friction capacity of the reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:22 PM
c.k.wang intermediate structural analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:58 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM
beam shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:01 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:49 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多