几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 03:37 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 gypsum roof

gypsum roof
be careful when evaluating the shear diaphragm of gypsum decks. older decks have highly variable properties from two significant issues...roof leaks and post-construction penetrations.
when originally placed, the gypsum deck likely had a compressive strength of somewhere between 500 and 1500 psi. subsequent roof leaks typically causes leaching of calcium compounds causing strength loss (localized). further, when modifications are made to the roof such as adding vents or other penetrations, there is rarely any reinforcement provided to restore the diaphragm. even a penetration as small as 1 sq. ft. can affect the strength of the deck.
all of this should be checked in a careful visual inspection and perhaps even an infrared thermographic scan to spot moisture anomalies in the deck.
the connection of the deck to the trusses is also a critical factor if you want to evaluate the shear capacity. after years of buffeting and vibration caused by wind, there may be localized failures around the connectors that could reduce or eliminate diaphragm capacity, close examination of a few critical connections would be beneficial.
v23 (visitor)20 jun 02 9:41
thanks ron,
thanks trussdoc,
trussdoc,
what is the typical connection of the deck to the truss?
your thoughts are very apreciated.
v23 - i've never actually seen a poured gypsum roof, but the advice is generic for all gypsum products used in shear.
v23,
i have not designed a gypsum deck in decades, but my recollection is that the gypsum planks have a tongue-and-groove, sheet metal edge around. the metal edge was fillet-welded to the supporting steel joists or beams at each advancing edge of the plank. alternatively, they could be welded, overhead, to the edge of the supporting steel.
regards
aef
v23 (visitor)21 jun 02 13:29
thank you all for your responces.
one more question on this subject.
the owner is proposing an extension and addition of the existing gypsum roof that will eventually get connected to the new roof made from diferent material (e.g. lightweight insulating concrete). and for that purpose part of the existing gypsum roof overhangs will need to be removed and eventually keep the remaining main area of the roof inside the perimeter walls.
does this sound possible? will the remaining existing roof retain its original strength?
thanks a lot in advence.
i would suggest contacting a contractor that does this type of work. while they may not design the system, their experiance installing systems would definitely give some insight into what works and what doesn't. the only name i have is rather old, but try anning johnson co., they have a chicago area office 708-681-1300. you might also find some others on the web.
v23,
the gypsum roofs i have worked on were poured on steel bulb tees welded at their base flanges to the roof beams or trusses. the bulb tees had gypsum board or plywood board spanning between them and resting on the upper surface of the base flanges. the plastic gypsum was then poured on top of this board to form the roof deck.
david
ron, and dlew,
thank you again,
the contractor finally removed the ceiling and completly exposd the underside of the roof deck. after a site visit i found a 24" x 24 " opening in the roof that was ued for duct penetration. now this opening is covered / fixed with some material on top of the original roof. the opening is cmpletly exposed from underneath. and i measured the deck thickness to be about 2.5". aditionally, there was a one very limited and small area of visible moisture spot along the groove and tonge joint. the spot runs about a foot and a half along the joint and about two inches in width.
the big question i have been asked if the roof deck should remain, or be replaced. to answer this question i need to check the shear diaphram. and my question to you is this:
1. what shear (lbs/ft) value do you use for diaphram shear resistance for the deck in a normal condition? (ignoring the opening and moisture presense.)
2. is the opening, as described above, significant enough to warrant the replacement of the roof deck?
3. is the moisture segnificant to order an infrared thermographic scan testing?
thank you for your insights on this issue
v2
the one gypsum roof deck i worked on involved spot leak repairs. as i remember it, the proceedure we followed was:
1. we inspected the deck from below to locate suspect areas, as you noted, water damaged areas are generally quite visible.
2. we opened the roof from the topside, working from areas known to be solid. don't forget your osha harnesses and hole protection!
3. we removed the damaged poured gypsum deck and panels (2'x4' if i re
v2...i would consider the following:
1. the gypsum plank (you mentioned tongue and groove joints, so i assume this is not a "poured" gyp deck) will contribute only enough resistance as can be supported before buckling the plank (neglecting the t&g effect). you will need to have some testing done on the deck to determine its compressive strength. this can be done by compressive strength testing. you might also consider using a test commonly used in geotechnical work...the direct shear test. this can be used to develop a direct shear resistance value of the material, just be careful in its application as this is a "micro level" shear of the material versus a "macro level" system resistance desired of the plank/support system.
2. negate much of the gypsum plank contribution and consider most of your diaphragm resistance comes in the network of the steel framing. remember, one significant contribution of the deck plane is for lateral bracing of the structural framing
jheidt2543,
thank you for your thoughts. your previous involvement in a similar case is well appreciated. thank you.
ron,
thank you for your thoughts. your experience is very helpful.
the deck is actually consisting of poured gypsum over gypsum boards that act as form deck.but thank you for your help.
v2
the question that i still have is what practical shear value could be used to do a quick check on the diaphram capacity in transfering shear to the end walls before ordering any additional expensive remedial or testing work?
again, thank you in advance.
v2
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
flat roof repairs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:23 PM
design of poured gypsum roof decks huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:46 PM
capacity of a gypsum roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:50 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
a flat roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:05 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:38 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多