几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 09:30 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 cmu deflection limits extents

cmu deflection limits extents
suppose i have a beam directly supporting cmu. deflection limit = l/600. what about the girder that supports this beam? not directly loaded with cmu, but still required to meet l/600? what if this girder frames in to another girder? does this girder, now twice removed from direct cmu loading, need to meet l/600?
no, it's just the beam that is directly supporting the cmu that is required to meet a certain deflection criteria for the cmu.
respectfully disagree with you, haynewp. agree that for a single span condition l/600 is very appropriate for new construction. however, if the load path through supports for the masonry is more complex, and depending on the extents and geometry of the masonry being supported, both local (for a single member) and macro (for all
i think it would be the differential deflection at each end of the support beam that would cause a problem and not an overall movement. if each end of the support beam deflects a certain amount, unless the deflection is different on each end, then how does this affect the wall?
i think you are right, it does need to be looked at, but to keep a girder to l/600 because it supports another girder (at l/600) that supports a beam (also restricted to l/600), because the one beam has cmu on it? seems like overkill to me.

good point about differential movement of support points.
perhaps i am generally being conservative. however, if the total of combined deflections of the entire support structure exceed the l/600 guideline, that could be a potential issue. lppe's situation is a little unusual in that he has a greater number of
i think lppe is speaking of a hypothetical situation. personally i would not count rigid-body deformation in with the deflection of the beam to find whether it meets l/600. basically i would hold only the beam directly supporting the cmu to the l/600 value unless there are special detailing considerations to tell me otherwise. if there is an adjacent wall for instance i would not want a great deal of deflection relative to the two walls. i would also try to put some sort of a practical limit on the total deflection.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
brick deflection limits huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:48 PM
brick cladding deflection limits huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:48 PM
allowable beam deflection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:50 AM
aisc lrfd and deflection calculation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:39 AM
【转帖】getting the extents yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 11:33 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:54 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多