几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 08:12 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 earthquate loading on falsework

earthquate loading on falsework
are there any codes that anyone knows of (preferably aashto) that deals with earthquake loads on falsework. i started designing a lot of falsework throughout the country and the person who did this before me told me that he honestly had never thought about it. after talking about it we agreed that it is kind of a judgement call due to the fact that most of the falsework is not up for an extended period of time. but there are some instances where some may be up for a year or so.
is it strictly engineering judgement? or is there any codes dealing with it?
are there life safety issues related to what you reference?
i'm not sure about aashto, but asce 37 "design loads on structures during construction" might be a useful reference.
muscog
there could be human safety issues. if there are workers on the falsework, which there often are during working hours then there is a safety issue.
in the formwork(falsework) industry, earthquake loading is typically considered beyond the design scope of a formwork designer.
the aci guide for formwork, from committee 347, does not include earthquake loading as an expected load to formwork, though it does not specifically exclude it.
in my work, i do not design for earthquake loads, nor do i design for hurricane or tornado loading. the magnitude of the loading is immense and the cost often cannot be justified with the expected return period.
as a side note, the construction dangers of hurricanes and tornadoes are dealt with through safety plans within my company. as seismic zones change, we may need to add an earthquake procedure. however, i cannot forsee designing forming systems for seismic loading in the near future.
all of that said, if you are working in a seismically active zone, you may find yourself compelled to attempt to design for these forces. there is certainly no reason not to other than practicality and economics, but i know of no guide or code reference that will tell you to.
daniel toon
i agree with dtgt2002.
i think it's unreasonable to design the same as for say a building. if the project has a long time frame, then maybe design accordingly. i suppose you could always look at it from the standpoint that people will be following osha and would be tied off if up high for example. maybe the safety system would be designed for the seismic loading and the other not. i see it being up to you to decide.
in reviewing caltrans criteria, there is nothing published regarding falsework, only permanent structures. even though it is entirely possible and likely that a construction site in many areas of california will experience a small to moderate earthquake during a 6 - 12 month construction period.
however, comparing seismic to tornados and hurricanes is like apples to bananas. storm events are very predictable, but unfortunately seismic events are not.
cvg
thanks, i guess if any state would have desing criteria for earthquakes it would be ca.
i will keep seismic in mind and if i can economically design for it, i will. otherwise i guess i will just hope for the best.
my version of the caltrans falsework manual dates from 1993, and it indicates (in section 3-1.04) that the design horizontal load (which can act in any direction) is "the sum of any actual loads due to equipment, construction sequence or other causes, plus an allowance for wind. in no case may the design load be less than two percent of the total supported dead load at the location under consideration."
it goes on to say that the bracing should be designed to resist the horizontal design load with the falsework in either the loaded or unloaded condition.
continuing, it says that the 2% value will typically govern for falsework heights less than 30 feet, wind may control for falsework heights between 30 and 40 feet, and wind will govern most designs where falsework height exceeds about 40 feet.
please keep in mind:
this is not the current version of the manual. the current one is probably available as a download from the caltrans website.
this is applicable to construction types and wind conditions typical of california. your situation may vary.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
dump truck axle loading - while dumping huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:56 PM
bridge deck removal falsework huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:08 PM
arema loading behind retaining wall supporting tracks huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:49 PM
do-160 static loading vs impact loading huangyhg 精密机械 0 2009-09-05 10:39 PM
【转帖】is there a way of interrupting dwgdxf file loading yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 04:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:01 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多