几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 06:22 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 i beam into shear wall connection

i beam into shear wall connection
i am designing a cantilever beam which will be connected to a shear wall. my supervisor instructed me to use hilti bolts to anchor the i beam into the shear wall. how do i design this connection?
is there an easier way to anchor the i beam into the shear wall?
design the embed plate as a base plate. determine the required shear and tensile forces in each bolt and design the hilti anchors accordingly.
be sure to take spacing and edge distances into account. also, given that it is a cantilevered beam on an embed with epoxy anchors (no redundancy - this seems like a critical connection), be sure to check the creep characteristics of the epoxy and also consider using a higher factor of safety than hilti gives for their allowables (i blieve they us a f.s. of 4).
touching on what structuraleit brings up, some senior engineers have given me some advice on post-installed anchors that i believe is sound.
the capacity of these bolts is very dependent on proper installation. once you get out into the field you realize some contractors are much better than others. we typically design these bolts for a higher factor of safety- typically twice that stated in the hilti tables. this isn't cheap, but depending on the application could be a good idea.
frv-
i don't think it has been implemented yet, but hilti has been talking about "certifying" people to install these adhesive anchors because, as you stated, the capacities are so dependent upon proper installation.
the certification would be for an individual, not a company, and would follow that person (i.e. if that person left the company they would need to have someone else certified).
i certainly don't think that unqualified people will not be installing the adhesive anchors anymore, but it is a step in the right direction.
one thing to keep in mind here in the icbo eis reports for many of these anchors is that they are not supposed to be applied in a situation where shock or vibratory loads, to include seismic loads, are to be resisted. if that is the case, then another type of anchor or connection should be used.
i frequently use an embedded steel plate with nelson stud anchors welded to the back, with the finn plate for the steel beam being field welded to the emmbedded plate. the beam is then bolted to the finn plate, and the top and bottom flanges welded to the embedded plate. not quite as simple, but it avoids the vibratory load issue.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
an important note.
most chemical anchors do not stand up very well in elevated temperatures. if this connection needs to be fire rated then you need to find an anchor that still works at elevated temperatures (rare) or use a mechanical anchor.
the same thing applies to welding, all welding should be carried out before the chemical anchors are installed.
it is not clear from your post if the shear wall is existing or proposed, but if it has not been poured yet then an embedded plate would be much more appropriate.
structuraleit-
we had a guy from hilti come to our office to give us a presentation on their new adhesive system (a result of the investigation of the big dig tunnel liner collapse) and he mentioned the certification. however, i too am not about to start trusting contractors just yet.
i would not use epoxy anchors, i suggest using hilti tz or hda anchors.
certified installers for anchors is not a bad idea. i heard a story of a builder who was installing anchors and did not clean out the hole before injecting the epoxy, needless to say the anchor was not anchored and just pulled out (schoolboy error). the sudden pullout of an anchor can be just as devastating as a weld fracture.
studentcivil08,
resolve you moment into a push-pull and design the anchors for the resulting pullout force.
does your beam frame in-plane of the shear wall or onto the face of the wall. if your framing onto the face of the wall, be sure you follow your moment through the wall.
also consider what effects temperature and vibration may have on your connection as mentioned above.
through bolts with plates on both sides of wall eliminates the contracter certification debate. analyze the wall after the design of the plate/bolts for moment capacity.
has the shear wall been cast yet?
would prefer to embed weld plates into the wall to later weld to the canti beam. just be careful about expansion of the plate when welding (provide a gap around the edge of the plates).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
foundation wall 40 feet below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:38 PM
concrete beam to wall connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:43 AM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM
beam strengthening huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:53 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多